Press Conference with
Israeli Prime Minister Olmert
(May 23, 2006)
PRESIDENT BUSH: Thank you. Mr. Prime Minister, welcome.
I'm particularly pleased to welcome Mrs. Olmert to
the White House, as well. Thanks for coming.
The Prime Minister and I have known each other since
1998, when he was the mayor of Jerusalem, and I was
the governor of Texas. And I remember you greeting
me in your office there, and you probably thought you
were going to be the Prime Minister -- I wasn't sure
if I was going to be the President. (Laughter.)
We've just had a really productive meeting. We reaffirmed
the deep and abiding ties between Israel and the United
States. And those ties include our commitment to democracy
and our strong belief that everybody has the right to
worship freely. The ties include growing trade and economic
relationships. The ties include important educational
exchange programs that allow Israeli students to study
in American colleges and universities, and American students
to travel and study in Israel.
In our meeting, the Prime Minister and I recalled
the great contributions to peace made by Ariel Sharon.
I asked the Prime Minister to convey my very best wishes
to Ariel Sharon's sons.
Prime Minister Olmert and I discussed peace and security
in the Middle East, which the people of Israel seek
and the American people support. In 2002, I outlined
my vision of two democratic states, Israel and Palestine,
living side-by-side in peace and security. Prime Minister
Olmert told me that he and his government share this
vision. The international community seeks to realize
this goal to the road map, which calls for a comprehensive
settlement that resolves all outstanding issues between
Israelis and Palestinians. I believe, and Prime Minister
Olmert agrees, that a negotiated final status agreement
best serves both the Israelis and the Palestinians,
and the cause of peace.
Palestinian Authority President Abbas favors and speaks
out for peace and negotiations. Yet, the Hamas-led
Palestinian government does not. Hamas needs to make
a strategic choice for peace. The United States and
the international community have made clear that Hamas
must recognize Israel's right to exist, must abandon
terror, and must accept all previous agreements between
the Palestinian Authority and Israel. No country can
be expected to make peace with those who deny its right
to exist and who use terror to attack its population.
Today, Prime Minister Olmert shared with me some of
his ideas -- I would call them bold ideas. These ideas
could lead to a two-state solution if a pathway to
progress on the road map is not open in the period
ahead. His ideas include the removal of most Israeli
settlements, except for the major Israeli population
centers in the West Bank. This idea would follow Prime
Minister Sharon's decision to remove all settlements
in Gaza and several in the West Bank.
I look forward to learning more about the Prime Minister's
ideas. While any final status agreement will be only
achieved on the basis of mutually agreed changes, and
no party should prejudice the outcome of negotiations
on a final status agreement, the Prime Minister's ideas
could be an important step toward the peace we both
support. I'm encouraged by his constructive efforts
to find ways to move the peace process forward.
And finally, the Prime Minister and I shared our concerns
about the Iranian regime's nuclear weapons ambitions.
The United States and the international community have
made our common position clear: We're determined that
the Iranian regime must not gain nuclear weapons.
I told the Prime Minister what I've stated publicly
before: Israel is a close friend and ally of the United
States, and in the event of any attack on Israel, the
United States will come to Israel's aid. The United
States is strongly committed, and I'm strongly committed,
to the security of Israel as a vibrant, Jewish state.
I look forward to our continuing discussions after
this press conference. I'm not sure the delegations
realize this yet, but we're going to shed ourselves
of our delegations and the Prime Minister and I are
going to go up to the Residence and sit down and have
a continued dialogue. And if we decide to brief our
delegations on what we discuss, we will do so. But
if not, they're going to have to guess. (Laughter.)
And then I'm looking forward to dinner.
Welcome.
PRIME MINISTER OLMERT : Thank you, Mr. President.
I thank you for your kind invitation to visit Washington,
and for the opportunity to meet with you and discuss
the many issues on our common agenda. Our meeting was
enlightening, and I look forward to working closely
with you in the coming years, to deepen the friendship,
understanding and bilateral ties between the United
States and Israel.
I also recall our meeting in the city hall when you
and I were strolling around the beautiful building,
at the terrace on the sixth floor, watching the walls
of the city of Jerusalem. At that time you were the
governor, I was the mayor, and I think none of us thought
that the day would come that I will have the honor
and the privilege of being hosted by you as President
of the United States and Prime Minister of Israel.
I could sense then your deep connection to the Holy
Land, and your friendship and commitment to the state
of Israel. I must say, Mr. President, that my instincts
did not fail me. I, and the entire people of Israel,
appreciate your true friendship and unwavering commitment
to Israel's security and its well-being as a vibrant
Jewish state. Your involvement in the Middle East and
personal contribution to the efforts towards resolving
the Israel-Palestinian conflict has been significant.
The vision which you outlined in your historic speech
of June 2002, of two democratic states living side-by-side
in peace and security, is the basis of any progress
towards a solution in this region. Your unreserved
support of the disengagement plan in your letter of
April 14, 2004, to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon -- and
I join you in praying for his recovery -- were the
basis for the success of its implementation. What you
immediately recognized to be an historic state was
later adopted by all those who were skeptical in the
beginning.
I intend to exhaust every possibility to promote peace
with the Palestinians, according to the road map, and
I extend my hand in peace to Mahmoud Abbas, the elected
President of the Palestinian Authority. I hope he will
take the necessary steps which he committed to in order
to move forward.
Unfortunately, the rise of Hamas, a terrorist organization
which refuses to recognize Israel's right to exist,
and regards terrorism as a legitimate tool, severely
undermines the possibility of promoting a genuine peace
process. As you stated, Mr. President, the Palestinian
Authority headed by Hamas government must abandon the
path of terrorism, dismantle the terror infrastructure,
honor agreements and recognize Israel's right to exist.
By doing so they will find us a willing partner in
peace. However, we will not enter into any kind of
partnership with a party which refuses to recognize
our right to live in peace and security.
Despite our sincere desire for negotiations, we cannot
wait indefinitely for the Palestinians to change. We
cannot be held hostage by a terrorist entity which
refuses to change or to promote dialogue. If we come
to the conclusion that no progress is possible, we
will be compelled to try a different route.
I presented to the President ideas which I believe
could help advance his vision and prevent a political
stalemate. According to these ideas, we will remove
most of the settlements which are not part of the major
Israeli population centers in Judea and Samaria. The
settlements within the population centers would remain
under Israeli control and become part of the state
of Israel, as part of the final status agreement. This
process of free alignment would reduce friction between
Israelis and Palestinians, ensure territorial contiguity
for the Palestinians, and guarantee Israel's security
as a Jewish state with the borders it desires.
The implementation of these ideas would only be possible
with the comprehensive support of the United States
and the international community. I anticipate working
with you to explore ways to advance this.
We discussed the Iranian issue. The Iranian regime,
which calls for Israel's destruction, openly denies
the Holocaust, and views the United States as its enemy,
makes every effort to implement its fundamentalist
religious ideology and blatantly disregards the demands
of the international community. The Iranian threat
is not only a threat to Israel, it is a threat to the
stability of the Middle East and the entire world.
And it could mark the beginning of a dangerous and
irresponsible arms race in the Middle East.
Mr. President, we appreciate your efforts to curb
Iran's nuclear ambitions, including through the U.N.
Security Council. They are of crucial importance. The
international community cannot tolerate a situation
where a regime with a radical ideology and a long tradition
of irresponsible conduct becomes a nuclear weapons
state. This is a moment of truth. It is still not too
late to prevent it from happening.
I thank you again for your gracious hospitality and
for our discussions. I look forward to continue working
with you, Mr. President. Thank you very much.
PRESIDENT BUSH: We'll take two questions a side, starting
with Steve Holland.
Q You mentioned that the West Bank plan could be an
important step. Doesn't this sweep away the U.S. principle
of a negotiated two-state solution? And should the
Palestinian side approve any plan that would establish
Israel's final borders?
PRESIDENT BUSH: You just heard the Prime Minister
say that he's going to exhaust all options to negotiate,
that he wants to reach out a hand to President Abbas.
And I agree. I said in my opening statement that the
best solution is one in which there's a negotiated
final status. And we discussed -- we spent ways --
we spent some time discussing about how it's important
to get a Palestinian President to the table. And the
Prime Minister says he looks forward to discussing
the issue.
And so our preferred option, of course, is there to
be a negotiated settlement. On the other hand, as the
Prime Minister said, that if he's unable to find a
partner in peace, if nothing can go forward, he is
willing to think about ways to advance the process
forward.
And in order to solve this problem, there needs to
be willingness to take the lead, and creativity, and
the desire to follow through on the vision. The most
important aspect about peace is to have a vision for
peace. And I appreciate the Prime Minister's vision
of two states, side-by-side -- two democratic states
side-by-side in peace. That's possible.
And so what I come away from the meeting with is that
the Prime Minister, one, has a vision; two, willing
to reach out to determine whether or not that vision
exists with the Palestinian President, which I think
it does; three, is willing to work to see whether or
not it is possible for two sides to come together,
and if not, is still willing to consider other ways
to move the process forward. That's, to me, a very
positive statement.
Q You said you wanted to hear more. Is there anything
that worries you about this plan?
PRESIDENT BUSH: No, the only thing that worries me
about the plan is that Hamas has said they want to
destroy Israel. And the reason that worries me is,
how can you have two states, side-by-side in peace,
if one of the partners does not recognize the other
state's right to exist? It's illogical for somebody
to say, I'm for a state, side-by-side with another
state, and yet I don't want the state to exist. And
so we spent time talking about Hamas, and I assured
the Prime Minister that our position is steady and
strong; that Hamas must change.
Now, we care about the Palestinian people -- and I
say, we, both of us -- he can speak for himself on
this issue -- but we are trying to set up a mechanism
that supports the Palestinian people. Our beef is not
with the Palestinian people. Our beef is with the government
that -- a group in the government that says they don't
recognize Israel. And so the United States, we're working
with the Europeans -- Condi's people in the State Department
are working with the Europeans to come up with a mechanism
to get food and medicine and aid to the Palestinians.
You may want to comment on it yourself, Mr. Prime
Minister.
PRIME MINISTER OLMERT: Thank you, Mr. President. Indeed,
the government, Sunday, decided to spend 50 million
shekels buying medical equipment -- 50 million shekels,
about $11 million -- for the time being, to buy medical
equipment and drugs needed for the hospitals in Gaza.
And as I said during the Cabinet meeting, we will spend
any amount of money needed in order to save lives of
innocent Palestinians suffering from the indifference
of their government. We will not hesitate to do it.
We will use the revenues that we have collected, and
more if necessary. We will make arrangements, together
with our friends, so that the supplies will arrive
directly to those who need them.
This is a humanitarian commitment. We are absolutely
committed to help innocent people that suffer from
the brutality and the intransigence of their own government,
and we will continue to do it at all times.
Thank you, Mr. President.
Q Mr. Prime Minister, are you satisfied from what
you have learned out of your meeting with the President
with regard of the Iranian issue? And what's your message
to the Israeli public about this issue?
And, Mr. President, with your permission, there is
a military option, from your point of view, to solve
the threat of the Iranian problem, their work on --
to getting a nuclear weapon?
PRIME MINISTER OLMERT: The Iranian issue was discussed,
indeed, between the President and myself. And we'll
continue to talk about it later. Obviously, there is
a major threat posed, as I've said already, and the
President said, by the Iranians and their attempts
to have non-conventional capabilities and also to build
up delivery systems and the ballistic missiles that
can hit major centers all across Europe, not just in
the Middle East.
This is something that needs to be stopped. We discussed
this issue at length, and there is a total agreement
and understanding between the President and myself
that there is a need to stop it. And we reviewed the
different ways how to do it, and I am very satisfied
with what I heard from the President and on what we
agreed that we would continue to do in order to achieve
this goal.
PRESIDENT BUSH: Our primary objective is to solve
this problem diplomatically. I've told the American
people that I will, on all issues, we'll try diplomacy
first and exhaust diplomacy. And I explained to the
Prime Minister that -- about our diplomatic efforts
-- the most important thing in diplomacy is that there
be a shared goal and -- in other words, you have to
have a common objective, a common goal in order to
get people to come together around it. And now we have
got a common goal throughout most of the world, and
that is, Iran should not have a nuclear weapon. And
that's important, and we are now working the diplomatic
front around that goal.
We have a variety of options, one of which, of course,
is the United Nations Security Council, if the Iranians
aren't willing to show progress toward that goal. We're
working very closely with what's called the EU3. That's
Germany, England and France. And I've been pleased,
and Secretary of State Rice has been pleased about
their willingness to stay tough on the goal, of achieving
the goal. Sometimes when you've got a variety of negotiating
parties, it's easier for one -- a non-transparent negotiator
to pick off a weak link. And yet, they've been firm,
and that's important for Israel to know. It's important
for me to praise our partners for that strength of
purpose.
Obviously, there's other parties we have to work with,
including Russia and China. In other words, you can't
get anything out of the U.N. Security Council unless
there's an agreement that the Iranians are not negotiating
in good faith and aren't willing to go forward. And
so we're spending a lot of time working with our Russian
friends, in particular, to make it clear to them that
Iran is showing no good faith.
And one of the interesting issues that the Iranians
have tossed out in this debate is that they believe
they have the sovereign right for civilian nuclear
power. And my position has been, fine, it's just you
don't get to enrich the fuel necessary for the plant.
And so we provided a -- I thought a very interesting
opportunity for them to say, if you want civilian nuclear
power, you can have your plant and the international
consortium will provide the fuel for the plant. And
we'll pick up the spent fuel from the plant. And this
was a very realistic and reasonable approach, and it's
been rejected by the Iranians.
And so I say to our friends in our consortium, I'm
not so sure these people really do want a solution
and, therefore, let us make sure that we're willing
to be working together in the U.N. Security Council.
That's where we are. We're headed -- we're on the cusp
of going to the Security Council. And I repeat to your
question, obviously, we'd like to solve this issue
peacefully and diplomatically. And the more the Iranians
refuse to negotiate in good faith, the more countries
are beginning to realize that we must continue to work
together.
Martha. Yes, yes.
Q If we can switch to Iraq, sir.
THE PRESIDENT: Iraq. Okay.
Q I know that this is something you're leaving up
to your commanders, but from what you've heard from
your commanders, how confident are you that you can
start drawing down troops by the end of the year?
THE PRESIDENT: First of all, we are making progress
in achieving our objective of training the Iraqis to
take the fight to the enemy. And the reason I know
that is because I talk to our commanders quite frequently.
And we're making good political progress, as the world
saw in the formation of a unity government. The government
has yet to get their full cabinet in place, although
we think that will happen relatively quickly. And then
this sovereign government is going to assess their
security situation and their security forces and their
needs, and work with our commanders. We haven't gotten
to the point yet where the new government is sitting
down with our commanders to come up with a joint way
forward.
However, having said that, this is a new chapter in
our relationship. In other words, we're now able to
take a new assessment about the needs necessary for
the Iraqis. And when I get that report from our commanders,
I'll share it with others and you.
Q Sir, can I just add --
THE PRESIDENT: Please --
Q The U.S. has the most powerful military in the world,
and they have been unable to bring down the violence
in any substantial way in several of the provinces.
So how can you expect the Iraqis to do that?
PRESIDENT BUSH: If one were to measure progress on
the number of suiciders, if that's your definition
of success, I think it gives -- I think it will --
I think it obscures the steady, incremental march toward
democracy we're seeing. In other words, it's very difficult
-- you can have the most powerful army of the world
-- ask the Israelis what it's like to try to stop suiciders
-- it is a difficult task to stop suicide bombers.
That's the -- but that's one of the main -- that's
the main weapon of the enemy, the capacity to destroy
innocent life with a suicider.
And so I view progress as, is there a political process
going forward that's convincing disaffected Sunnis,
for example, to participate? Is there a unity government
that says it's best for all of us to work together
to achieve a common objective which is democracy? Are
we able to meet the needs of the 12 million people
that defied the car bombers? To me, that's success.
Trying to stop suiciders -- which we're doing a pretty
good job of on occasion -- is difficult to do. And
what the Iraqis are going to have to eventually do
is convince those who are conducting suiciders who
are not inspired by al Qaeda, for example, to realize
there's a peaceful tomorrow. And those who are being
inspired by al Qaeda, we're just going to have to stay
on the hunt and bring al Qaeda to justice. And our
Army can do that, and is doing that right now.
Q Mr. President, the Prime Minister just said that
the settlement blocks in the major population centers
will be part of Israel, annexed to Israel in the future.
Do you support that? Would the United States sanction
that?
And, Mr. Prime Minister, can you give us some assessment
of the time that you are willing to wait for the emergence
of a Palestinian partner?
PRESIDENT BUSH: My answer to your question is, refer
to my April 14th, 2004 letter. I believed it when I
wrote it, and I still believe it. (Laughter.)
Q -- (inaudible) --
PRESIDENT BUSH: -- rare that I wrote the letter, or
rare that I believed what I wrote? (Laughter.)
PRIME MINISTER OLMERT: First of all, I want to emphasize
again what I said before and what I said before the
elections and immediately after the elections in Israel,
and when my government was inaugurated in the Knesset
just a couple of weeks ago. I said that we will make
a genuine effort to negotiate with the Palestinian
side on the basis of the road map, which is the framework
for future negotiations towards, hopefully, a peace
agreement between us and the Palestinians.
I meant precisely what I said. I'll make every possible
effort. And in order to examine it carefully and seriously,
I will certainly meet with the elected President of
the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas. We haven't
yet decided about the timing. It will be in the near
future. And I will do everything that I can in order
to help create the necessary circumstances for such
negotiations to take place, providing, of course, that
the Palestinian partner will have to not just to make
a public commitment, but to be able to deliver on the
basic requirements of the road map and the Quartet
decisions, namely to recognize the state of Israel
and its right to exist as a Jewish state, to unarm
the terrorist organizations, and to implement all the
obligations of the agreement signed between the state
of Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
So we will make an effort. And I say time and again
that we accept the sincerity of Mahmoud Abbas as the
elected President of the Palestinian Authority. He
is genuine, he is sincere, and we hope that he will
have the power to be able to meet the requirements
necessary for negotiations between us and the Palestinians.
How soon it will be? The sooner the better. I don't
want to prejudge it at this point. I think it's too
early. And I didn't come with a timetable to meet with
the President of the United States.
We shared our observations. I entirely agree with
the vision of the President as it was outlined so brilliantly
in the famous speech in June of 2002, which really
set the course for all the developments that took place
in the Middle East since then and created the possibility
for ultimately the disengagement, which was a turning
point in the history of the Middle East. And we are
grateful to the President for the courage that he manifested
then in presenting this outline and in being the first
to support the disengagement, and carry on in spite
of the difficulties and the skepticism and the question
marks posed by different countries at the beginning.
Most of them joined in later.
So we are anxious to have negotiations. And we will
look and find every possible avenue to help establish
a process of negotiations on the basis of these conditions.
However, as I said, we will not wait indefinitely.
If we will reach the conclusion that in spite of all
these efforts, it is impossible to implement the principles
of the road map through a negotiating process, we'll
look for other ways to implement these principles,
and to ultimately create a situation where there are
secured borders for the state of Israel, with the population
centers in the territories as part of a state of Israel,
and with a contiguous territory that will allow the
Palestinians to establish their own Palestinian state
alongside the state of Israel. And hopefully, this
is something that will happen within the next three
to four years.
Again, I am grateful to the President for the efforts
that he was making and for his willingness to examine
together with me these new ideas, -- as he called them,
bold ideas -- in the event that all other options will
not be possible.
Thank you.
PRESIDENT BUSH: Good job.
END 5:36 P.M. EDT
Sources: The White House |