Memorandum on Dimona Inspection and Nuclear
Proliferation in the Near East
(February 5, 1965)
One of many documents
at this time reflecting the Johnson Administration's
concerns regarding Israel's nuclear policy
and the fear that Israel was secretly engaged
in weapons development.
136. Memorandum From the
Department of State's Executive Secretary
(Read) to the President's Special Assistant
for National Security Affairs (Bundy)1
Washington, February 5, 1965.
SUBJECT
Dimona Inspection and Need to Implement Initiative to Prevent Nuclear
Proliferation in the Near East
A United States inspection team visited the Dimona reactor site January
30, 1965. Although the ten hours spent at the site did not permit as
detailed a visit as desirable, the team believes there was sufficient
time to determine the status of activity at Dimona. Major findings (see
enclosure)2 included:
1. The future direction of atomic energy development in Israel appears
uncertain because anticipated acquisition of a nuclear power and desalting
plant has increased Israeli interest in slightly enriched uranium fueled
reactors from abroad and reduced interest in developing natural uranium
fueled reactors in Israel.
2. While nothing suggests an early weapons development program, the
Dimona site has excellent development and production capability that
warrants continued surveillance at intervals not to exceed one year.
The team findings indicate that we can afford to accede to Prime Minister
Eshkol's request that we postpone the next agreed six-monthly inspection
until after the parliamentary elections in November this year.
We remain concerned that Israel may have succeeded in concealing a
decision to develop nuclear weapons. The team findings must be weighed
against the following facts:
1. Israel concealed the existence of the Dimona reactor from us for
about two years.
2. Israeli officials did not allow adequate time for thorough inspection
of the Dimona site and arranged no visits to sites of projected related
facilities.
3. Israeli officials ruled questions about procurement of uranium from
abroad "outside the scope of the visit" and suggested taking
them up through normal diplomatic channels.
4. Israel is acquiring missiles from France designed to accommodate
either high-explosive or nuclear warheads.
5. Public and private statements by Israeli officials suggest military
planning that includes the use of nuclear weapons.
Given these circumstances, we urge prompt approval of the request of
the Acting Secretary to the President December 18, 1964,3 for authority to initiate negotiations with Israel to extend IAEA safeguards
to all Israeli nuclear facilities.4
Ben H. Read
Notes
1 Source: Johnson Library, National Security File,
Country File, Israel, Vol. III. Secret; Exclusive Distribution. Filed
with a brief covering memorandum from Komer to Bundy noting that the
inspection was reassuring but that "we remain suspicious."
The memorandum bears no indication of the drafter, but another copy
indicates that it was drafted by Russell and cleared by Jernegan, Davies,
Charles W. Thomas, and Scott George, Director for Atomic Energy and
Aero-Space in G/PM. (National Archives and Records Administration, RG
59, Central Files 1964-66, AE 11-2 ISR)
2 The enclosure, entitled "Preliminary Draft Report
on Dimona Inspection Team," unsigned and undated, is not printed.
3 Not found.
4 A marginal note in Komer's handwriting next to this
paragraph reads, "Not now, till we get Jordan arms sorted out."
Sources: Foreign
Relations of the United States, 1964-1968, V. 18, Arab-Israeli
Dispute 1964-1967. DC: GPO,
2000. |