Investigation |
Date |
Conclusion |
U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry |
June 10-18, 1967 |
The attack was a case of mistaken
identity. Calm conditions and slow ship speed may
have made American flag difficult to identify. No
indication the attack was intended against U.S.
ship. |
CIA Report |
June 13, 1967 |
The attack was not made in malice
and was a mistake. |
|
June 9-20, 1967 |
Outlined "findings of fact,"
bud did not make any findings about the actual attack. |
Clifford Report |
July 18, 1967 |
No premeditation, but "inexcusable
failures" by Israeli forces constituing "gross
negligence." |
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations |
1967 |
Secretary of Defense McNamara testified
he supported conclusion that the attack was not
intentional. |
Senate Armed Services
Committee |
Feb. 1, 1968 |
No conclusion. Secretary
McNamara makes comparison of attack on Liberty to that on Pueblo with regard to uncertainty
about what was happening at the time of the incident. |
House Appropriations Committee |
April-May 1968 |
Navy communications "foulup"
and no conclusion regarding Israeli actions. Much
of report remains classified. |
House Armed Services Committee |
May 10, 1971 |
Critical of Navy communications, no
conclusion regarding Israeli actions. |
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence |
1979 |
Responding to critical book by Liberty
crewman James Ennes, Senate investigation found
no merit to his claim attack was intentional. |
National Security Agency |
1981 |
Liberty was mistaken for an Egyptian
ship as a result of miscalculations and egregious
errors. |
House Armed Services Committee |
June 1991 |
Responding to request from Liberty
Veterans Association, Subcommitte on Investigations
launched probe that concluded there was no evidence
to support allegations made by the Association and
no reason for further investigation. |