Remembering the Six-Day War
(Updated June 2013)
June 5 marks
the anniversary of the Six-Day
War, one of the most pivotal and controversial conflicts in the history of the Middle East. The consequences of the war
remain ever present even today. The following
points are crucial to understanding
the war and its implications.
Why are we talking today
about the West
Bank and the “Palestinian
question”? How did Israel get into
a situation where it is reviled internationally as an
“occupier” and accused of a refusal
to trade “land for peace”?
Prior to June 1967, Israel did
not “occupy” any Arab land and
did not seek to expand its territory. Israelis
were not talking about populating Judea and Samaria or
establishing “Greater Israel.” Similarly,
Palestinians were not calling for the establishment
of a Palestinian state in the West
Bank,
which was controlled by Jordan,
or in the Gaza
Strip, which was ruled by Egypt.
Since declaring
independence in May 1948, Israelis have dreamed of living
in peace with their neighbors
and consistently expressed their desire to
negotiate with the Arabs to resolve their
differences. In an address to the UN
General Assembly on October 10, 1960,
Foreign Minister Golda
Meir challenged Arab leaders to meet
with Prime Minister David
Ben-Gurion to negotiate a peace settlement.
Egyptian President Gamal
Abdel Nasser responded
on October 15, claiming that Israel was trying
to deceive the world, and reiterating that
his country would never recognize the Jewish
State.
Meanwhile,
Syria used the Golan
Heights, which tower 3,000 feet above
the Galilee, to shell Israeli farms and villages.
Syria’s attacks grew more frequent
in 1965 and 1966, while Nasser’s rhetoric
became increasingly belligerent: “We
shall not enter Palestine with its soil covered
in sand,” he said on March 8, 1965. “We
shall enter it with its soil saturated in
blood.”
While Nasser continued
to make speeches threatening war, Arab terrorist attacks
grew more frequent. In 1965, 35 raids were
conducted against Israel. In 1966, the number
increased to 41. In just the first four months
of 1967, 37 attacks targeted Israel.
Meanwhile,
Syria’s
attacks on Israeli kibbutzim from
the Golan
Heights provoked a retaliatory strike
on April 7, 1967, during which Israeli planes
shot down six Syrian MiGs. Shortly thereafter,
the Soviet Union — which had been providing
military and economic aid to both Syria and Egypt — gave Damascus information alleging
a massive Israeli military buildup in preparation
for an attack. Despite Israeli denials, Syria decided to invoke its defense treaty with Egypt.
On May 15, Israel’s Independence
Day, Egyptian troops began moving into
the Sinai and massing near the Israeli
border. By May 18, Syrian troops stationed
along the Golan
Heights were prepared for battle.
Nasser ordered the UN
Emergency Force, stationed in the Sinai
since 1956, to withdraw on May 16. Without
bringing the matter to the attention of
the General
Assembly, as his predecessor had promised,
Secretary-General U Thant complied with
the demand. After the withdrawal of the
UNEF, the Voice of the Arabs proclaimed
(May 18, 1967):
As of today, there no longer
exists an international emergency force to
protect Israel. We shall exercise patience
no more. We shall not complain any more to
the UN about Israel. The sole method we shall
apply against Israel is total war, which
will result in the extermination of Zionist
existence.
An enthusiastic echo was
heard on May 20 from Syrian Defense Minister Hafez
Assad:
Our forces are now entirely
ready not only to repulse the aggression,
but to initiate the act of liberation itself,
and to explode the Zionist presence in the
Arab homeland. The Syrian army, with its
finger on the trigger, is united....I, as
a military man, believe that the time has
come to enter into a battle of annihilation.
On May 22, Egypt closed
the Straits of Tiran to all Israeli
shipping and all ships bound for Eilat.
This blockade cut off Israel’s only
supply route with Asia and stopped the
flow of oil from
its main supplier, Iran.
The following day, President Johnson condemned
the blockade and
tried, unsuccessfully, to organize an international
flotilla to test it.
Nasser was fully aware of
the pressure he was exerting to force Israel’s
hand. The day after the blockade was set
up, he said defiantly: “The Jews threaten
to make war. I reply: Welcome! We are ready
for war.”
Nasser challenged Israel
to fight almost daily. “Our basic objective
will be the destruction of Israel. The Arab
people want to fight,” he said on May
27. The
following day, he added: “We will not
accept any...coexistence with Israel...Today
the issue is not the establishment of peace
between the Arab states and Israel....The
war with Israel is in effect since 1948.”
King
Hussein of Jordan signed
a defense pact with Egypt on May 30. Nasser then announced:
The armies of Egypt, Jordan,
Syria and Lebanon are poised on the borders
of Israel...to face the challenge, while
standing behind us are the armies of Iraq,
Algeria, Kuwait, Sudan and the whole Arab
nation. This act will astound the world.
Today they will know that the Arabs are arranged
for battle, the critical hour has arrived.
We have reached the stage of serious action
and not declarations.
President Abdur Rahman Aref
of Iraq joined
in the war of words: “The
existence of Israel is an error which must
be rectified. This is our opportunity to
wipe out the ignominy which has been with
us since 1948. Our goal is clear — to wipe
Israel off the map.” On
June 4, Iraq joined the military alliance
with Egypt, Jordan and Syria.
The Arab rhetoric was matched
by the mobilization of Arab forces. Approximately
250,000 troops (nearly half in Sinai), more
than 2,000 tanks and 700 aircraft surrounded
Israel.
By this time, Israeli forces
had been on alert for three weeks. The country
could not remain fully mobilized indefinitely,
nor could it allow its sea-lane through the
Gulf of Aqaba to be interdicted. Israel’s
best option was to strike first. On June
5, the order was given to attack Egypt. Jordan then
attacked the Israeli cities of Jerusalem and Netanya ignoring
a personal message to King
Hussein from Israeli Prime Minister Eshkol to
refrain from hostilities.
The Soviet Union was supplying
massive amounts of arms to the Arabs. Simultaneously,
the armies of Iraq, Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait and Algeria were
contributing troops and arms to the Egyptian,
Syrian and Jordanian fronts. Israel’s
principal arms supplier at the time, France,
imposed an embargo on arms shipments. The United
States, which had warned Israel that if it
chose to fight it would have to go it alone,
also stopped all arms deliveries to the region.
After just six days of fighting,
Israeli forces broke through the enemy lines
and were in a position to march on Cairo,
Damascus and Amman. A ceasefire was
invoked on June 10. The speed with which Israel
devastated the might of the entire Arab world
shocked the world and humiliated the Arabs.
The psychological impact was significant
and lasting. Israelis came out of the war
with a false sense of security and their
military prowess that would come back to
haunt them in 1973. The shame felt by the
Arabs would compel their leaders to prepare
for the chance to exact revenge and regain
their honor.
Israel’s
victory came at a very high cost. In storming
the Golan
Heights, 115 Israeli soldiers perished — roughly
the number of Americans killed during Operation
Desert Storm. Altogether, Israel lost
twice as many men — 777 dead and 2,586
wounded — in
proportion to her total population as the
U.S. lost in eight years of fighting in Vietnam.
Had Israel waited for the Arabs to strike
first, as it did in 1973,
the cost would certainly have been much higher
and victory could not have been assured.
Following the cease-fire,
the Israeli government immediately expressed
a desire to negotiate a peace agreement with
its neighbors. Arab leaders met
in Khartoum and provided their answer,
declaring there would be “no
peace, no recognition and no negotiation
with Israel.”
In the course of defending
itself against Jordanian forces, Israeli
troops reunited Jerusalem and
captured the West
Bank. Israel also gained control of the Gaza
Strip, the Sinai Peninsula and the Golan
Heights. Overall, Israel’s
territory grew by a factor of three and incorporated
more than three-quarters of a million Palestinians — most
of whom were hostile to the government.
Ultimately,
more than 60,000 Palestinians of the approximately
325,000 who fled during the fighting (these
were Jordanian citizens who moved from one
part of what they considered their country
to another to avoid being caught
in the cross fire) were allowed
to return.
The war also had religious
significance. Under Jordanian rule, Jews
and many Christians were forbidden from entering
the Old
City of Jerusalem,
which is the site of the Western
Wall, Judaism’s holiest
site, and many Christian shrines. After capturing
the city, Israel discovered the Jordanians
had desecrated many
holy places, synagogues and cemeteries. After
the unification of Jerusalem,
each religious group was granted administration
over their holy sites and the city was made
accessible to people of all faiths.
The unwillingness of any
Arab state to make peace left Israel with
no choice but to hold onto those territories
it had captured until the Arabs were prepared
to negotiate a settlement. In the meantime,
the government made every effort to make
their occupation as benign as possible, though
it recognized that the nation’s security
needs required that it restrict some Palestinian
rights.
On November 22, 1967, the
international community laid the foundation
for future peace negotiations. The UN
Security Council adopted Resolution
242,
which
called for Israeli withdrawal “from
territories occupied” in 1967 in return
for “the termination of all claims
or states of belligerency.” The framers
of Resolution 242 recognized that
territorial adjustments were needed because
the previous armistice lines had proven indefensible.
Prior to the war, at its narrowest point,
Israel was just 9 miles wide.
Consequently, the framers of the resolution
deliberately left open the question of how
much territory Israel should relinquish in
exchange for peace. By leaving out the words “all” or “the” when
referring to the disputed territories, they
acknowledged the need to make adjustments
in the final borders that would allow Israel
and the other states in the region “to
live in peace within secure and recognized
boundaries free from threats or acts of force.”
Every Arab leader who has
subsequently been willing to make peace
has received both land and peace from Israel. When
Egyptian President Anwar
Sadat demonstrated the
courage and vision to accept Israel, the
leaders of Israel responded by making peace and
withdrawing from the vast Sinai desert that
had provided a valuable strategic buffer.
Israel also gave up military bases, oil fields
and evacuated Jewish communities.
Israel also
offered to grant autonomy to
the Palestinians, which was less than the
full independence they demanded, but a
step that would likely have led to statehood.
The Palestinians rejected the offer and
continued to pursue a strategy based on
terror.
Many Israelis hoped that
an agreement could be reached to return control
over most of the West
Bank to Jordan,
but King
Hussein was too weak to make a deal and
faced widespread opposition in the Arab world,
which had never recognized his 19-year occupation
of the area. When the Palestine
Liberation Organization (PLO) became
the “sole legitimate representative of
the Palestinians,” negotiations over
the fate of the West
Bank and Gaza (which Egypt did
not want back as part of the treaty with Israel)
was separated from the relationship between
Israel and Jordan.
It took another 15 years after Egypt made
peace with Israel before King
Hussein was willing to negotiate
an agreement. Israel again
responded with concessions.
In 1993, Israel reached
an apparent breakthrough with
the Palestinians and was prepared to withdraw
from most of the disputed territories and
allow the Palestinians to establish a state
in exchange for peace. The Oslo
agreement collapsed, however, when the
Palestinians failed to fulfill their obligation
to stop terror
attacks.
Still, Israel withdrew from most of the Gaza
Strip and nearly half of the West
Bank.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud
Barak made another effort to trade land
for peace when he met with President Bill
Clinton and PLO chairman Yasser
Arafat in 2000. Barak was
prepared to give up all of Gaza,
97% of the West
Bank, dismantle most settlements and
allow the Palestinians to establish a state
with East Jerusalem as its capital. But Arafat said no.
Israel gave the Palestinians
yet another opportunity to prove they were
interested in peace when it evacuated the
entire Gaza
Strip in 2005. Nothing
has prevented the Palestinians from creating
all of the trappings of a state in Gaza.
Had they done so and demonstrated they were
interested in coexistence with Israel by
stopping the violence, Israelis
undoubtedly would be interested in negotiating
a compromise in the West
Bank. Instead chaos and ongoing attacks
against Israel have caused most Israelis
to regret the disengagement and to resist
calls for future concessions until a new
Palestinian leadership emerges that is interested
in peace.
Meanwhile, Israel has negotiated
the outline of an agreement with the Syrians
that would result in the return of most,
if not all of the Golan
Heights. Once again, the obstacle to
an agreement is that Israel is offering land
while Syria is
unwilling to give peace in exchange.
Israel has
given up approximately 94% of the territories
won in the 1967 defensive war. So the dispute
today is over only 6% of that territory and
Israel has already said it is prepared to
give up most of that.
After the victory in the Six-Day
War, Israelis hoped they had convinced
their neighbors that Israel was a permanent
fixture in the Middle East. Now, 40 years
and five wars later, many Israelis doubt
they will ever be accepted in the region,
especially as radical Islam grows stronger
and its adherents explicitly call for Israel’s
destruction and strive to obtain weapons
of mass destruction.
Still, despite never
enjoying a day of peace in the last four
decades, the people of Israel continue to
hope for “peace now” and to look
forward to a day when Palestinian and other
Arab leaders demonstrate the courage and
vision of Anwar
Sadat and King
Hussein and
heed the words of Isaiah: “They
shall beat their swords into ploughshares,
and their spears into pruning-hooks; nation
shall not lift up sword against nation, neither
shall they learn war any more.”
|